JANUARY 8, 2018
( Referring to Document # 132, 133, 134 ) – So it appears that the Applicant and her husband have found what could be the more evidence for why Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy are so motivated to have the Applicant and her family removed from the building.
It appears that the cost of living on the same floor as the Applicant, and right next door has increased substantially from approximately $1,087.07 to $1,400. That is an increase of 23% in the cost of living here in the building overnight and after the new elevator was completed.
So it appears that Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, and his son Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio motivation to have the Applicant and her family removed from the building so they can suddenly increase the rent by 23% for any new tenants that would occupy the unit.
It also appears that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy has another motivation to have the Applicant removed from the building, outside of her racist and prejudice views about her and her family. Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy wants to help make money for Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, and his son Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio.
It appears that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy believes that if she keeps lining the owner’s pockets with new forms of income from around the building. That Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, and his son Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio will overlook her racist rants, prejudice behavior and deliberate attempts to inconvenience and stress out the Applicant and her family.
It appears that there might just be something to the Applicants claims that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy believes the money she brings in, the safer he job is with Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, and his son Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio.
( Referring to Document # 135 ) – On April 30, 2018 Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy posted a letter in the building information board regarding “ New Applications for Parking ”.
Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy stated “ Please note that effective as of May 1, 2018 any tenant wishing to rent a parking spot on the property, the rental cost for a parking spot has risen to $75.00 outside and $100.00 for inside. This affects all new parking request for current and new tenants as of May 1, 2018. As noted on all applications, parking rentals are an additional fee per month that is added on your rent and last month’s rent is required as well as a completed parking form with all required information of your vehicle. Parking regulations are noted on the forum. For those of you on the waiting list for a parking spot, please request the parking form. If not already done so, and complete and submit to the office at your earliest convenience, with the last months rent for the parking space. We have some spots coming available for the 1st of June outside that we can allot for the waiting list parking. The available spots will be given on a first come first served basis and all requirements must be met. ”
It again appears that there is a 25% increase for outside parking and a 50% increase in cost for indoor parking.
There has been no obvious new expense for Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, and his son Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio in regards to maintain the parking area. But there has definitely been an increase in outgoing cash flow for their brand new elevator and security system.
So again is this why Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, and his son Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio have over looked everything that has transpired between the Applicant and Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy since June 2016?
Again is this why Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, and his son Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio are so willing to overlook everything Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy said?
It appears that the saying – Money talks, and bullshit walks has new meaning. It appears that as long as Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy finds new ways to fill the owner’s pockets with cash, she is secure in her job.
While on the topic of parking, the Human Rights Tribunal now needs to hear about the Applicant and her new car.
MARCH 14, 2018
( Referring to Document # 136 ) – The Applicant sends Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy text at 10:44 in regards to needing a parking spot for the families new car. It stated “ Hello Stella, my husband and I bought a car and we are picking it up on Saturday morning so we would like a parking spot please. What info do you need? Thanks. ”
( Referring to Document # 137 ) –,Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy places a letter in the Applicants mailbox. It stated “ We hope this letter finds you and your family well. We are writing to you in response to the text message received today with the request for a parking spot on the property.
First, thank you your request but please note text message is not an acceptable track able way of communication between tenants and building staff, as per the RentSafeTO Bylaw, as texts are not easily printable for tenant files and for review by City Officials upon their request. Please submit all requests in writing by either our Tenant Request Form or by email in the future. At this time we do not have any parking spaces available on the property and if you wish to be added to the waiting list for a parking spot please submit the vehicle information with your name and apartment number and we will advise you when we have something available for you to rent. Due to the limited parking spaces available in Visitors Parking area we can’t allow tenant to temporarily park there as we do not have enough spaces for all whom are waiting. I am sorry but you will have to find a parking space off site as some others have had to do. ”
( Referring to Document # 138 ) – The Applicate and her husband forward an email at 11:56 to Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, and his son Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy. The email stated “ Dear Louie Liscio, Anthony Liscio and Stella Reddy, We were informed this afternoon by Stella Reddy that there are apparently no park spots available for us in the building parking lot. I am not sure what Stella Reddy means by finding alternative parking when no parking is allowed on Kennedy Road or the surrounding side streets overnight. I am not sure what all of you expect tenants to do in regards to parking when you have allowed for numerous tenants to have multiple spots. Like other tenant(s) in the building, I guess I will also have to park in the visitors parking area, as I am STILL a resident in the building and until a space becomes available. Please issue me a parking pass like the other tenant(s), so there will be no confusion as to my car being a visitor verses resident. If our car is ticketed or towed, I will be deducting it from the rent. Again it appears to us that Stella Reddy has allowed for her personal beliefs and feelings towards ******* and our family to play a role in this poor decision making. She once again is trying to inconveniencing us by stating there is no parking available even though she has obviously continue to accommodate other tenant(s) recently and in the past for multiple and single parking spots. But somehow now she suddenly cannot accommodate us when we request a parking spot. There are numerous tenants within the building that do not even have cars, so that means that there has to be numerous tenants that have 2 parking spaces. There are 36 parking spots, multiple tenants that do not have cars and only 35 units in the building. There is mathematically no way the parking area should be full if everyone has only 1 spot. Unfortunately your need to make free money for parking off the tenants does not supersede my needs to park my car in the building where I live. Someone with 2 parking spots should be the ones to find alternative parking for one of their cars/motorcycles as I was told for my one car. If not and you force me to find alternative parking and I have to pay for it. I will be deducting it from the rent. ”
MARCH 15, 2018
( Referring to Document # 139, 140, 141 ) – The Applicant and her husband forwards 3 emails at 18:04 and 18:15 to Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, and his son Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy. The email stated “ Hello Stella, Anthony and Luigi, as I have been unable to locate any alternative parking off site as requested by you. I would like to request a visitors parking pass until I am able to find some where to accommodate my car. Thanks ”
MARCH 16, 2018
( Referring to Document # 142 ) – The Applicant and her husband forward an email at 11:56 to Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, and his son Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy. The email stated “ We are forwarding this email to provide you with my car information for a Temporary/Visitor Parking Pass.
- Year: 2018
- Make: Nissan
- Model: Qashqai
- Colour: Nitro Green
- Plate: CDVK 807
Please put in our mailbox as you have previously done on all the other occasions when we would rent a car.”
MARCH 17, 2018
( Referring to Document # 143 ) – The Applicant and her husband forward an email at 11:56 to Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, and his son Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy. The email stated “Dear Louie Liscio, Anthony Liscio and Stella Reddy, Sorry, the dealership gave us the wrong plate number yesterday via text. They sent us a picture of the right plates just now. Picture of car and plate attached to this email.
- Year: 2018
- Make: Nissan
- Model: Qashqai
- Colour: Nitro Green
- Plate: *** ***
Please put Temporary/Visitor Parking Pass in mail box as previously done in the past when we rented a car. If you have any questions or concerns, please text or email. ”
It is at this point that the Human Rights Tribunal gets a full understand of what transpires next.
Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, and his son Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy do not bother to respond to the Applicants request for a visitor parking pass until a parking space comes available.
At the time there we 2 empty slots that were not being used and were empty. Parking slots 9 and 12.
There were multiple units that owned multi parking spaces, for example;
- Unit # 202 had parking spaces 23 & 24
- Unit # 404 had parking spaces 17 & 19
- Unit # 405 had parking spaces 25 & 22
- Unit # 406 had parking spaces 28 & 29
And Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy, herself had 2 parking spaces, 25 & 22.
What was so amazing about this whole situation was that unit # 202 on had one car and yet Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy would not force them to give up the empty space for the Applicant.
Another interesting fact is that when learning about Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy second parking space 22. Upon looking at the car, it was clear that the car has never moved when it was placed in there over a year earlier. The tires where flat, it was cover in a thick coat of dust. It was confirmed when the Applicant spoke with his neighbor, who parked next to car. He had mentioned that he had been parking there for a long time and he had never seen the car move. In fact he had no idea even who the car belonged to. Even after asking the owner Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy whose car it was.
So apparently Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy wanted to keep the fact that she had a 2nd parked indoors from everyone in the building.
Then there is the fact that parking spaces 9, 12 were open and never used. The Applicants husband would photo graph these spaces on a daily basis at all hours of the day and night to show that these spaces where never being used, and yet Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy refused to allow the Applicant to use them.
What the Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy did allow the Applicant to use to park in was the visitors parking area. That meant on 5 occasions when the Applicant and/or her husband came home. They found the 6 visitor parking slots full. That meant that they had to go speak with the Children’s Aid Society down the street to ask if they could park there until a parking space became available in visitor parking.
Is this why that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy refused to give the Applicant a parking space? Did she hope that the Applicant would arrive home and not be able to find a place to park? Did she hope that the Applicant would have to park on the street overnight, resulting in getting a ticket as Scarborough does not allow for overnight street parking? Maybe Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy was hoping the applicant would park in one of the empty spaces and then she would have the vehicle towed?
What every the reason, it is clear that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy could have very well offered the Applicant an empty parking space and she did not.
Again it appears that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy whole agenda behind not giving the Applicant a parking space was that she enjoyed the idea of inconveniencing the Applicant and causing her stress to find alternative parking.
Now it needs to be discussed the parking situation at the time of this application. Since the Applicant asked for a parking space back in March 14, 2018 there have been
- current and new tenants who obtain a 1st vehicle after the Applicant requested a parking space are given a parking space.
- current and new tenants who obtained a 2nd vehicle since the Applicant requested a parking space, are given a Visitor Parking passes until a regular parking space becomes available.
And yet Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy refuses to give the Applicant a Visitor Parking Pass and stated “ I am sorry but you will have to find a parking space off site ”
It is clear that by this point that Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, and his son Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy are willing to accommodate everyone else but the Applicant when it comes to issuing Visitor Parking Passes and parking spaces.
At the time of filing this application there are at least 4 known parking spaces available that Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, and his son Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy could offer the Applicant.
June 1, 2018
( Referring to Document # 144 ) – The Applicant pays $942.19 rent via a e-transfer. The Applicant deducts $146.88 for the purchase of a counter top toaster oven on March 3, 2018.
Applicant at the time does not included receipt.
June 2, 2018
( Referring to Document # 145, 146 ) – Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy sends the Applicant and email at 8:50 where she stated “ Good Morning, This morning at 12:23AM, Alto was sent a partial e-transfer for your rent. The amount sent was $942.19, your monthly rent is $1087.07, resulting in a shortfall of $144.88 Please advise if this was made in error. If so we will forgo accepting until you have the full amount. Or, if you cannot pay your full rent due to unforeseen reasons please let us know when we can expect the $144.88 balance. May we also take this time to remind you that your current rent balance including this months $144.88 is a combined total of $1231.95. This is a result of your cancelling of October 2017 rent. See attached cancellation notice. ”
June 3, 2018
( Referring to Document # 147, 148 ) – Applicant sends an email to Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy. The Applicant attaches a copy of the Receipt for the counter top toaster oven.
What is absolutely amazing about what has transpired over these 3 days is how bad-minded and determined Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy are to have the Applicant and her family removed from the building.
The Human Rights Tribunal needs to understand about why the October rent was cancelled by the Applicant of October 5, 2017.
( Referring to Document # 116, 117, 118, 119 ) – Noting the Order by SJTO adjudicator Kevin Lundy dated October 3, 2017. SJTO adjudicator Kevin Lundy makes and Order that the Applicant is required to move out by October 31, 2017.
This is the same day that she has a hearing in front of the Landlord and Tenant Board about Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy.
SJTO adjudicator Kevin Lundy created the Order 8 months ago, and it would have taken effect 7 months ago.
At the time the applicant had e-transferred her rent on October 31, 2017, but due to the order issued by SJTO adjudicator Kevin Lundy for eviction. Alto Properties Inc. refused to take in and the Applicant cancelled the e-transfer as she was exploring her options on what she should and could do.
After consulting with a lawyer, it was explained that she should appeal. It was at this time the Appeal process was started and everything went on hold and frozen.
Since October 31, 2017 when the eviction should have taken place, but due to the Appeal it was stayed.
Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy have made absolutely no attempts to discuss or collect the last month’s deposit that was used in October 2017.
( Referring to Document # 104, 105, 106, 107 ) – Let us all also note since September 1, 2017 ( 9 months ) , Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy have made absolutely no attempts to fix or correct any of the several violations within the unit, that were in the Order by The City of Toronto Municipal Licensing and Standards officer Nicole Sweetapple.
It is amazing that Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy on June 2, 2018 noticed that the Applicants rent was short by $146.88 and must have instantly thought and cheered thinking that she and her husband were suddenly hurting financially and could not pay the rent in full.
What they did not realize is that the Applicant had not yet forwarded them the receipt for the counter top toaster oven therefore they did not get a copy when sending out the email to the Applicant.
Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy now decided they should capitalize on what they think is the Applicant and her husband finically challenging times, and they will seize the opportunity to try and build a new case to have the Applicant and her family removed from the building.
Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy figured that this would be a great opportunity to kick the Applicant and her husband while they were down and now, after 8 months request the last month’s deposit that was used in October 2017.
If there could have been any doubts in anyone’s minds that Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy are not always trying in every possible way to inconvenience the Applicant and her family at every possible chance given to them.
The actions of these 3 on them on June 2, 2018 remove any doubts.
The question the Human Rights Tribunal has to ask is;
- Why is it that suddenly Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy are so now interested in the Applicants last month’s deposit that was used in October 2017?
- Why hasn’t Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy not try to make any attempts for the past 8 months to collect it?
- Why is it that Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy have made absolutely no attempts for the past 9 months to repair anything in the Applicants unit, despite getting an Order from the city to do so?
- With so much evidence against Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy of their racist, prejudice and inappropriate behavior. Why have they all continued to try antagonizing and inconveniencing the Applicant and her family?
- With so much overwhelming evidence, why does Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy continue to fight this in the courts?
The fact that Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio allowed Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy to file the original N5 to have the Applicant and her family removed from the building. Knowing all this evidence is against them and their staff and they still continuing to participate in the Appeal process, clearly shows that this is far more than just a landlord and tenant issue.
This is evidence that this has become something very personal for Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy.
The Applicant and her family pay their rent on time, in full and take great care of the unit. They do not disturb other tenants and they get along with anyone in the building.
So it is clear that these above facts are not any grounds to want an Applicant and her family out of the building.
But what does make sense, is that Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio have been following blindly and condoning the words and actions of Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy for personal reason that are truly only know to them.
Whatever the reason are that Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio continue to endorse Alto Properties Inc. Employee Stella Reddy and her employment and behavior.
Their recent action is just another great example of everyone working in collusion to have the Applicant and her family removed from the building.
And for all of their bad-minded intentions and actions over the past 2 years, creating such a negative and hostile environment for the Applicant and her family. They cannot be rewarded and need to be corrected.
Their behaviour is not social acceptable nor at any time have they acted in good faith or tried to cooperate with the Applicant and her family. All they have done is try to have the Applicant and her family removed from the building in retaliation for her enforcing her rights and for calling them out on their behaviour and actions.