SEPTEMBER 20, 2017
( Referring to Document # 79 ) – The Applicants husband ends up speaking with hsband, who is the male occupant of unit # 406 outside in the parking lot. During their conversation the Applicants husband brought up the letter from Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy dated July 13, 2017.
The male occupant from unit #406 stated that he is “ good friends ” with the unit in question ( # 203 ) whose window and balcony the Applicants air conditioner was dripping on.
The male from unit #406 stated that he “ was talking with them just the other day, and there was no mention,” nor had there “ been any mention of that problem ” from them.
The Applicants husband asked the male from unit # 406 if the next time he was speaking to them, “ could you ask them to call me? ” The male occupant stated “ okay, that should not be a problem. ”
SEPTEMBER 2017 TO OCTOBER 2017
The Applicants husband and the husband from unit # 406 speak on numerous occasions on the phone in regards to Tenant Association and other topics.
SEPTEMBER 26, 2017
Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. employee Russell Reddy at in attendance at the Landlord Tenant Board in regards to a hearing for the N5 given to the Applicant by Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy.
During this hearing Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy stated “ Yes I do ” when being asked by an SJTO adjudicator Kevin Lundy “ Stella Reddy, do you promise to tell the truth throughout this proceeding? ”
During the hearing Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy was stated “ I don’t even talk like that – I’m sorry, ” in regards to calling the Applicant and her husband’s bi-racial children the prejudice and derogatory slur “ Mulatto ”.
Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy went on and stated “ I called her children “mullato.” I had to ask my niece what that word meant, because I didn’t know what it meant. I don’t talk like that. ”
Then Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy stated “ I’m Newfie. Anybody asks me, I’m a Newfie. I have nothing to do, I don’t say I’m Canadian or I work in Canada. ”
Now Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy stated in a public hearing and in front of SJTO adjudicator Kevin Lundy that that she cannot be a racist because she is a ” NEWFIE ” herself.
She repeats this statement on several occasions during the entire hearing as to imply that it has some relevance and proof to her argument of not being a racist.
Apparently Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy does not understand, or does not care that the term “ Newfie ” is defined as a prejudice slur that is used in Newfie Jokes that depicts Newfoundlanders as stupid and foolish.
It appears that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy wants the SJTO adjudicator Kevin Lundy to believe that a Caucasian, late 50’s female, born and raised in Canada did not know what the word “ Mullato ” meant.
For Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy to even try and convince anyone of this, only shows here desperation to try and free herself of her actions. I guess that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy will say that she does not know what the words Nigger or Spook means next, and that she will have to go once again to her niece to get some cultural awareness lessons on inappropriate vocabulary.
It is so ridicules for Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy to make such a far reaching statement, and to believe that she believed she could convince the SJTO adjudicator Kevin Lundy or anyone in the gallery listening to it.
And still Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy acts as if she is so naive as to know what the word “ Mullato ” means, and yet she claims she cannot be a racist despite using prejudice slurs like the word ” NEWFIE ” in a public forum.
Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy went on and stated “ I don’t speak that way. I’m from Newfoundland. I have very beautiful great nephews and nieces who are half black, and my nephew is as black as you can get. He’s even darker than she is, ( while pointing at the “ Black ” Applicant ) I have no issue with any kind of race. I just recently moved another gentleman into the building… ”
Now the Human Rights Tribunal is beginning to understand how Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy really sees people whose skin tone is not the same as hers.
For example, Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy stated that her “ nephew is a black as you can get, He’s even darker than she is, ( while pointing at the “ Black ” Applicant ) ”
So let us put Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy statement in a visual perspective.
( Referring to Document # 115 ) – The picture on the left is approximately the same complexion as the applicant.
Now according to Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy her “ nephew is as black as you can get, He’s even darker than she is.”
Now clearly the picture on the right depicts an accurate account of what Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy stated that her “ nephew is as black as you can get ” and the picture of the right is certainly darker than picture on the left.
You see there are a few problems with Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy use of these racist slurs and used prejudice charged statements and language.
Does Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy really see her own family/nephew as being this dark? She must, as she could have just said that her nephew was a darker shade of brown or black then she is, while NOT pointing at the “ Black ” Applicant.
She clearly stated her “ nephew is as black as you can get”. There is absolutely no debate on this issue!
So the picture on the right is defiantly the color of black, and it’s as “ black as you can get ” on a printer.
Now, let us remember that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy did not say – brown as you can get, she said “ black as you can get ”. It appears that the picture on the right does fit perfectly with the racist and prejudice charged statement made by Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy
Now maybe Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy meant when she stated he was as “ black as you can get ” was her nephew’s character and mannerisms?
Maybe she meant to say that the “ Black ” Applicant only acts partially “ Black ” and that her nephew acts more “ Black ” than her? Maybe her nephew even acts borderline Ghetto?
Whatever the excuse it is that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy finds to justify her use of these racist slurs and used prejudice charged language, there is no denying that the statement alone was inappropriate, let alone pointing at the Applicant at the same time while saying these ridicules words, centering her out and referring to her skin tone.
If Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy set out to trying and embarrass the applicant in a public forum, she definitely succeeded.
Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy could have pointed to a few of other individuals in the gallery that where for their own personal business, who were the same or who were a little lighter skin toned than the Applicant. But nope, Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy chose to us the Applicant as a comparison and her example when describing her Nephews skin tone.
The Applicant and her husband can assure the Human Rights Tribunal that they have seen Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy nephew who was visiting his aunt, Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy sister who also lives in the building in unit # 405.
The Applicant and her husband can assure the Human Rights Tribunal that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy nephew is approximately the same age as their son who is 9, and by no means is Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy nephew skin tone anywhere near the “ black as you can get ” complexion that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy made reference to.
The fact that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy used these racist slurs and used prejudice charged language in a public forum with a gallery full of people of every nationality, race and sex is astounding. Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy made these remarks without fear or repercussions or consequences. Does Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy think that the rest of the world thinks and see non-whites the same way she does?
Let us not begin to forget that not only did Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy makes these racist slurs and used prejudice charged language in a multicultural public setting, she used these racist slurs and used prejudice charged language in front of a SJTO adjudicator Kevin Lundy, who did not bother to correct her behavior.
Yes, Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy denies every calling the Applicants and her husband’s children “ Maulatto ” and yet, in a multicultural public forum she use such these racist slurs and used prejudice charged language like “ Newfie ” and refers to her own blood as being as “ black as you can get ” and refers to the Applicants skin tone while pointing and centering her out as an example.
( Referring to Document # 116, 117, 118, 119 ) – Even in the Order written on October 3, 2017 by SJTO adjudicator Kevin Lundy, he stated in paragraph 6
And Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy wants the Human Rights Tribunal to believe that she uses this type of language in emails to her bosses, in a multicultural public setting, in front of a SJTO adjudicator Kevin Lundy, but not on the street, in front of restaurant or even in the comfort of her own home?
But what is more disturbing then the racist slurs and use of prejudice charged language is that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy used in front of SJTO adjudicator Kevin Lundy on September 25, 2017.
That Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy handed in “ Black ”email dated August 24, 2017 at 18:19pm to Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio where she ranted and stated “ Sorry Anthony, I can’t take this lying down anymore and I filed a personal complaint with the Human Rights against them for their behavior. It is already gone as it was the first thing I did when I got home. They need to learn that just because she is black, they can’t throw out these accusations of racism and bigotry against people who don’t give them what they want or do things the way they want. This is their fall back to intimidate me to do things their way and I can’t do it anymore. The fact that they made all these accusations last year and nothing was done about it, they think they can keep it up and get away with it and it needs to stop. “, “ I would love to take them to the tribunal and have an adjudicator see how they talk and the accusation they make against me. “
It again appears that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy thinks that it is normal to rant and use racist ideology about someone’s skin tone in an email to their bosses and then feel comfortable enough to hand it in at a SJTO hearing and to a SJTO adjudicator, who is hearing that they ( The Respondent ) themselves have filed an application against you for being a racist and bigot.
So why did Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy do this?
- Was it that she was so comfortable with the SJTO system that she knew that no matter what was said about her by the Applicant, that the SJTO adjudicator Kevin Lundy would find no fault in her actions?
- Does Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy know something about the SJTO being geared to favor Landlords?
- Was it that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy really thinks that her ranting and racist ideology is acceptable evidence of her not being a racist?
Maybe it was a combination of both or everything?
Whatever Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy reasoning for handing in the incriminating email. It again shows that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy says what she feels and feels what she says. We may not know exactly what is in her heart, but we do know exactly what she said.
Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy goes on to state in the hearing other misleading things that the Applicant just does not have time to address do to time restraint, but will be more than willing to address at trial.
SOMETIME BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 27, 2017 AND OCTOBER 3, 2017
( Referring to Document # 120) – The Applicant receives a Notice of Enter from Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy for Annual Fire Inspection and Annual Unit Inspection on September 2, 2016 between the hours of 9:00am to 5:00pm.
OCTOBER 4, 2017
( Referring to Document # 121 ) – The Applicants husband receives an email at 7:05 from the City of Toronto Municipal Licensing and Standards officer Nicole Sweetapple. She stated “ The e-mail I received from property management indicated that they applied to the landlord and tenant board with an N5 for refusal of entry for the owners interest in maintaining the apartment. The hearing was scheduled for September 26th. I have not heard the outcome from the hearing. An e-mail I received October 2nd, indicated that they have Mircom Giardia coming Wed Oct 4 for the annual fire inspection and they will have staff bringing an oven element for the stove to be changed that day while they have access. As for the rest of the repairs, letters of entry will be provided to get the repairs done. I am being kept informed through the process, and the file is updated accordingly. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me, by e-mail or telephone at 416-397-7253. ”
At 9:53am, Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio knocked on the Applicants unit door. The Applicants husband answered the door and invited Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio and his fire inspector/contractor into the unit.
The fire inspector walked over, tested the smoke detector and then left. It took approximately 25 seconds. There was absolutely no interaction by Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio or the fire inspector/contractor with the Applicants husband.
With this interaction between the Applicants husband and Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio and the fire inspector/contractor, there were absolutely no issues as the Applicants husband was fully cooperative and polite.
As Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio and the fire inspector/contractor left the unit, the Applicants husband notice Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy standing in the hallway, in front of the elevator with a clipboard. The Applicants husband figured that they were now going to do the Annual Unit Inspection, but instead everyone walked away towards unit #304.
The Applicants husband than closed the door and continued to wait unit 17:00 for the Annual Unit Inspection to take place.
( Referring to Document # 122 ) – At 17:10, the Applicants husband sent an email to Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy after waiting for 7 hours for someone to return to do the Annual Unit Inspection stating “ It is now 5:10 pm and you have not returned to do the yearly inspection. You were here this morning to test the fire alarm with your contractor and made absolutely no mention that you would not be returning. I do not appreciate you having me sit here all day waiting for you AGAIN, and you could not be bothered to inform my wife or me that you were not going to return. According to your entry form you were supposed to do fire alarms and yearly inspections today between 9 am and 5 pm. You only completed the fire alarms. ”
OCTOBER 10, 2017
( Referring to Document # 123 ) – 6 days later, Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy finally responds at 11:49 to the email that was sent back on October 4, 2017 by the Applicants husband.
Alto Employee Inc. Stella Reddy stated “ Good Afternoon, Thank you for your email. Due to the hearing that was held on September 26, 2017, and we were waiting for the Hearing Order to come, it was prudent for staff not to attend the apartment to complete the annual inspection. Thank you for your time and if you have any questions please feel free to contact me. “
So it appears that again it was not “ prudent ” at 9:53for Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio or Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy to inform the Applicants husband that they would not be returning to the Applicants unit to do the Annual Unit Inspection later that day.
So not only this time was Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy who had the Applicants husband again sitting around 7 hours for an appointment that they deliberately cancelled and deliberately did not notified him about. It was also now Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio who was in on it.
It appears that now it was the two of them that enjoyed the idea of not notifying the Applicant or her husband of the cancelation and causing them the inconvenience of again sitting around and waiting around for 7 hours for and appointment that they only knew was not going to happen.
When Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy stated “ it was prudent for staff not to attend the apartment to complete the annual inspection “ there can be no doubt that they did not notify the Applicants husband of the cancelation.
The Applicants husband stated “ You were here this morning to test the fire alarm with your contractor and made absolutely no mention that you would not be returning. ”
Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy does not refute or deny the Applicants husbands claim of not being told about no one returning later that day. Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy admits that they decided approximately around September 26, 2017 that “ it was prudent for staff not to attend the apartment to complete the annual inspection “, “ Due to the hearing that was held on September 26, 2017 ”
That means that Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio or Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy decided 8 days before the actual Annual Unit Inspection that “ it was prudent for staff not to attend the Applicants apartment to complete the annual inspection ” as they were waiting to see what the Order from SJTO adjudicator Kevin Lundy was going to say. It also appears that they decided 8 days earlier that they were not going to tell the Applicant or her husband that they were not going to do the Annual Unit Inspection, despite putting on the Notice of Entry they were coming to do it.
So now let us go back and review the email sent from the City of Toronto Municipal Licensing and Standards officer Nicole Sweetapple to the Applicants husband on October 4, 2017.
Nicole Sweetapple stated “ An e-mail I received October 2nd, indicated that they have Mircom Giardia coming Wed Oct 4 for the annual fire inspection and they will have staff bringing an oven element for the stove to be changed that day while they have access. ”
Since Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio or Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy decided 8 days before the actual Annual Unit Inspection that “ it was prudent for staff not to attend the Applicants apartment to complete the annual inspection. ”
It is clear that Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio or Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy had no intention of fixing the Applicants stove, despite telling the City of Toronto Municipal Licensing and Standards officer Nicole Sweetapple they we that same day.
So it appears that the City of Toronto Municipal Licensing and Standards officer Nicole Sweetapple order requires that “ the rest of the repairs, letters of entry will be provided to get the repairs done. I am being kept informed through the process, and the file is updated accordingly. ”
Since the October 2, 2017 email from Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy to the City of Toronto Municipal Licensing and Standards officer Nicole Sweetapple, where she knowingly lied about fixing the Applicants stove on October 4, 2017 during the Annual Unit Inspection.
It has been 8 months and Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio, Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio and Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy had made absolutely NO ATTEMPTS TO FIX OR CORRECT anything described within Nicole Sweetapple’s Order.
NOVEMBER 8, 2017
( Referring to Document # 124, 125, 126 ) – The Applicants husband phoned the male occupant from unit # 406 at 15:04 and asked if he could drop by so they could talk about unit #203 signing a letter about the air conditioner.
( Referring to Document # 124, 125, 126 ) – At 17:41 the male occupant from unit # 406 calls the Applicants husband and ask him to meet him in the stairwell of the building.
At that time the male occupant from unit # 406 stated that Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio approached him and began question him as to why he was talk with the Applicant and her husband? The male occupant also went on to say that Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio made a threats to him about giving problems to Alto Properties Inc. owner Stella Reddy, and that he needs to stop or he will have to “ Remove ” him and his family from the building.
At the time the male occupant reassured the Applicant husband that he was not intimidated by the comments made by Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio, and that he will definitely now get in contact with unit # 203 for him.
( Referring to Document # 127 ) – Fast forward to June 3, 2018, the Applicants husband phone the male occupant from unit # 406 to discuss what was previously talked about in the stairwell back on November 8, 2017. The male occupant again clarifies that Alto Property Inc. owner did threaten him and his family with eviction if they did not quit giving Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy about her behavior.
NOVEMBER 15, 2017
( Referring to Document # 128 ) – After a week of not hearing from the male occupant from unit # 406. The Applicants husband sent him a text at 14:15 where he stated “ Hello…. Did you get to speak to unit 203 about the letter? “
( Referring to Document # 124, 125, 126 ) – At 18:31 that same night, the male occupant from unit # 406 called the Applicants husband and explained that he was with “ suit 203 ” and he would like to speak with the Applicants husband.
After the gentleman from unit # 203 got on the phone. They started discussion how it was that no one from their home complained or discussed with Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy the Applicants air conditioner dripping on their window ledge.
The gentleman from unit # 203 explained they themselves have an air conditioner, so why would they have their windows open, let alone complain about water slashing into their unit.
( Referring to Document # 79 ) – Again it appears that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy was trying to inconvenience, harass and stress the Applicant and her family. Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy stated that “ the tenant there cannot open the bedroom window, as the water splashes in the screen onto the inside of HER window still ”
It is clear when listening to the phone call between the Applicants husband and the gentleman from unit # 203, that this family never spoke to Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy in regards to the dripping air conditioner.
So why did Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy fabricate this lie?
It again it was just another way for Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy to get enjoyment trying to inconvenience the Applicant and she hopefully was waiting for the Applicant not comply to the request therefore Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy could serve her with another N5 for interfering with another tenants enjoyment of their unit.
NOVEMBER 16, 2017
( Referring to Document # 128 ) – The following day at 10:05 the Applicants husband sent the male occupant from unit # 406 a text where he stated “ Good morning… It again… Sometime this weekend can you please get the people to sign that letter and quickly write a letter stating they never had any conversation with Stella as it states in the letter and have them date, sign and phone number. I want to file my soliciting Monday but I can’t do it until I have the letter in hand. So if you could do that for me that would be awesome. Thanks family… ”
( Referring to Document # 128 ) – Again at 10:26 the Applicants husband sends another text where he stated “ File my application on Monday . No sure why auto correct put in the word soliciting. Sorry to bother you for the little confusion. ”
NOVEMBER 21, 2017
( Referring to Document # 128 ) – The Applicant receives a txt from the male occupant from unit # 406 at 18:17 where he stated “ His name is ***** – PHONE NUMBER ”
( Referring to Document # 128 ) – The Applicants husband replies at 19:53 “ Okay I will thanks ”
( Referring to Document # 129 ) – On this day at 20:11 the Applicants husband sends a text to the gentleman from unit # 203 where he stated “ Hi Sri… it it is apartment 303 above you. Are you free to talk? ”
NOVEMBER 22, 2017
( Referring to Document # 129 ) – On this day, again at 8:23 the Applicants husband sends another text where he stated “ Good morning, I hate to bother you but I need to know when I can get that letter from you in regards to Stella making false claims using your family. I can quickly type up a little note that will say – I ( your name ) have never had any conversation with Stella Reddy or Alto Properties in regards to the unit above me and the air conditioner, and all you have to do is sign and date it. If you give me a time I can type and print it up and bring it by you to sign. I am only asking because I want to file on these guys but I cannot included that letter if you’re not willing to state you have no knowledge of the conversation. All she will do is say that she did have the conversation. Please let me know. Thanks ”
NOVEMBER 25, 2017
( Referring to Document # 128 ) – On this day at 9:07 the Applicants husband sends a text to the male occupant from unit # 406 where he stated “ Hey, Can you try and find out today what is going on with 203? I have to file this week so I would like to know their position. I have to file with or without them. Thanks family. ”
NOVEMBER 28, 2017
( Referring to Document # 130 ) – On this day at 9:44 the Applicants husband sends a WhatsApp text to the male occupant from unit # 406 where he stated “ Hi, Sorry for using WhatsApp. I have to buy time for my phone later when I go out. Can you ask the people down below me if they still are willing to ask Stella about the letter? They can send her an email and just give me a copy or they can call her to the office and ask her there with me and you being present. That way I can show that they did question her about it that is all I need. I can go to court and say … Here I have an email they sent her stating they don’t appreciate what she did in using them as an excuse or I can say that I was present at the meeting when they questioned her about the letter. I know they are intimated by her, but they really have a good case to help us get rid of her. If they want we can record the phone call, let me known thanks. ”
DECEMBER 6, 2017
( Referring to Document # 130 ) – On this day at 15:48 the Applicants husband sends a WhatsApp text to the male occupant from unit # 406 where he stated “ Hi again. I have no time in my phone so I have to use WhatsApp. Can you tell me what the situation is with 203? Do they intend to help me out or are they scared? Please let me know. Thanks. ”
DECEMBER 14, 2017
( Referring to Document # 131 ) – On this day at 14:08 the Applicants husband sends a WhatsApp text to the gentleman from unit # 203 where he stated “ Hi, it’s unit 303. When we last spoke on Nov. 15 about Stella sending me a letter in regards to our air conditioner dripping on your window ledge. You had mentioned that you had never spoke with her in regards to this issue and that you were pissed off that she was calling your family’s name in something you had no idea about. You mentioned at the time you wanted to confront her about it and I asked you to hold off. I asked if you could sign the copy of the letter she gave me, that I gave you and to just write on it this conversation never happened. I have not heard back from you, and I am just following up to find out why? We do have a few options.
- 1 – You can sign the photo copied letter and put the little note stating you did not have this conversation with her.
- 2 – You can call her and record the conversation via on your phone and then email it to me or I can be present and record while you talk on speaker phone.
- 3 – Call her to have a meeting in the office with me present and you can ask her about it I front of me.
- 4 -come to court and tell the judicator that you had no idea about this letter and conversation with her.
I can video you stating that this conversation about my air conditioner never happened and I can play it for ghetto judicator. I totally understand you might be scared and worry for your family. But if you let this slide you are playing right into what she wants. Stella and Alton Properties do what they do because everyone is scared. If you do nothing they are going to know you got a copy of the letter and did nothing. If you think Stella is bad now with her N5 ‘ s. Do nothing and then watch her. Right now she being quite because of all the court stuff I am doing to her and Alto Properties. But when that is all said and done she will return to her old bully ways. Your letter or conversation with Stella will go a long way in getting her out of here. Plus I have to think that if she is found to be guilty of lying about you and your family. There has to be some legal compensation you can go after in the Landlord Tenant Board or civil court . There is no way she can call your name in something without your permission. Especially when it is a lie. Anyways please let me know where you stand about this issue and how you would like to proceed in dealing with Stella. If you do not reply I will assume that you are not willing to stand up against them and I will not bother you anymore. Thanks ”
DECEMBER 20, 2017
( Referring to Document # 130 ) – On this day at 10:12/10:18 the Applicants husband sends a WhatsApp text to the male occupant from unit # 406 where he stated “ Hi… I am going to file with the human rights again Stella and Alton Properties. I want to discuss in my paper work the conversation we had were Anthony hinted that you should not deal with me and my family and that you could be putting your family at risk of being evicted. I know that was not what he said word for word but that he did hint at it if you keep talking with me. I am going to tell the human rights board they can call you but do not let Stella or Alton Properties know what you talked about or even that they called you because of concerns for retaliation. It would be so much easier if you and 203 just wrote me a quick letter, but it appears 203 has had a sudden change of heart in regards to talking to Stella about the letter. Please let me know. We can’t have Stella and Anthony trying to intimate and threaten people and getting away with it. The problem will only get worse. Strength comes in numbers. Thanks ”
( Referring to Document # 131 ) – On this same day at 10:18/10:19 the Applicants husband sends a WhatsApp text to the gentleman from unit # 203 where he stated “ I am going to be filing a human rights complaint against Alton Properties and Stella Reddy in regards to this whole situation and their prejudice behavior. I am going to suggest that they call you to speak to you in regards to the letter about the air conditioner dripping into your unit and that you told me in a phone conversation that you did not file or speak to Stella or any Alton Properties Inc. employee about such a thing. I will also tell them that they need to keep that conversation between you and them and in fact they are to jot even notify or acknowledge if they do talk to you due to your concerns for retaliation from Stella and/or Stella for speaking about them. Are you okay with this idea? “
It has to be clear to anyone reading all these text from the Applicants husband to unit # 406 and # 203, he was trying to get a letter from the gentleman in unit # 203 confirming what was said in their phone call on November 15, 2017, of not them not speaking to Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy about the dripping Air Conditioner.
But it appears that suddenly the gentleman from unit # 203 had a change of heart, and it appeared that he no longer wanted to get involved, let alone give the Applicant the letter he stated he would.
So what happened?
It appears that after talking to the male occupant from unit # 406 in the stair well on November 8, 2017 and reassuring him that the threats made towards him and his family would not intimidate him. But in fact they must have!
As you can see the Applicants husband has sent multiple texts and it appears that NO ONE is bothering to reply back. It appears that the male occupant from unit # 406 must have told the same story about Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio threating him with eviction, to the gentleman from unit # 203.
This understandably made the gentleman from unit # 203 and therefore made the gentleman decided that he could not get involved as he did not want to take the chance of getting kicked out of the building and having to restart his and his family’s life somewhere else.
It now becomes very clear as to why Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy favors Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio over the father, Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio.
Alto Properties Inc. owner Anthony Liscio is a bully just like Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy and they both have the same mentality. Cross our paths and we will have you removed from the building in retaliation for disrespecting out authority.